DataMosh in DNA

March 31, 2009

Andrew Benson, Jitter teacher extraordinaire, recently posted some incredible effects that emulate compression artifacts, a technique called “datamoshing.” Here is an overview of some videos using this effect. In the popular realm, Chairlift and Kanye have exploited this effect.
 Now it’s your turn! 

Here’s a tutorial video explaining how you can integrate this patch into DNA to use as an effect. The bigger picture is that you can take pretty much any video effect patch, and with a few modifications, have (yet) another effect in DNA.

Some notes about this video:
1.) The patch was originally a Max5 patch – I used a super collider extension to convert the Max5 patch into a Max 4.6 patch – DNA only works with Max 4 patches. Feel free to ask for help on how you can do this in the comments or by email. It seemed too distracting to go through that in the video.
2.) You can download the converted patch and supporting files here.
3.) Yes, I received Andrew’s permission to do this!

0

Flickr In DNA

March 30, 2009

I recently made a Max patch to rip high-res photos from flickr photostreams and display them in Max. Now I want to incorporate this into DNA. Here’s how:
http://www.vimeo.com/3933638
This is a good example of using the DevKit to incorporate your own ideas about visuals into the expandable world of DNA.

Oh, and be sure to use the creative commons photostreams – it’s much easier to find streams that give you rights to use the images!
Here’s the patches used in the examples.

0

DNA DevKit

March 24, 2009
Tags: , , ,

On the heels of the DNA release, I’ve put together some simple patches and documentation that shows how you can make your Max and jitter patches functional in DNA:
http://www.lividserver.com/dl/DNA_DevKit.zip

It’s pretty easy, really. The main consideration is to boil down any process so that it can be controlled with one knob. As long as you follow the examples, and add the few required elements into your patch, you can add pretty much anything to DNA that you create in Max.

Your patch could be a processor of video. It can use shaders. It could be an audio player – just latch the DNA knob to the volume! It could be a video synthesizer that completely ignores any of DNA’s video sources. It could even be an automator that just sends messages to various components of DNA (check the Network.pat in the Extras folder for an example of how to use messages to control DNA). The possibilities are endless, really.

The great thing is that by using DNA as your foundation, you are free to explore the possibilities of Max/MSP/Jitter without having to build a performance system and UI in addition to creating things that expand your artistic capability.
Be sure to share your creations with others! You can post patches in the forums, or video of what you’ve done.
Enjoy!

2

Making the Livid Ohm64 – Faceplate

March 21, 2009

Faceplate

As you may have noticed, we have leaked our new Ohm64. It is such a relief to be able to finally show the world what we have been working very hard on over the last year. We just couldn’t resist.

My job as hardware designer is to not only design and build the controllers but to build and run the machines that make our parts. Our philosophy at Livid is to keep as much of our parts fabrication in-house as possible. This allows us to have more quality control, reduce costs to the end user, and make parts fabrication virtually on demand.

When you get an Ohm controller you are getting a handmade instrument that we make from parts that are rough cut by machines that we make. That is a lot of making and it is exhausting!

In the coming months we will be talking a lot about how and why we do what we do. We are not a big corporate company who gets everything made over seas, is completely proprietary and secretive. We want to open the doors and let you have a look around.

Let’s talk faceplates

As you may have noticed our faceplate requires a lot of cutouts. There are generally 3 methods for cutting a faceplate out of sheet metal:

Waterjet – This is a $200k to $500k machine that cuts through metal with a high powered concentrated abrasive water stream. The waterjet cuts very clean and precise. It can also cut about 5 at a time. Since it is cutting with water, you don’t have to worry about heat and deformation. But it is expensive. Really hard to build as the base of the machine holds all the water and re-circulates it under very controlled conditions. I wish we could afford one of these.

Laser cutting – It turns out that you need a VERY powerful laser to cut sheet metal. This can easily be a $200k machine new or maybe $50 – $100k to build if you can find a laser head. The good thing is that once you get a good laser head the gantry (X,Y,Z movement) does not have to be very sturdy just very precise. The down side to lasers are that they get the metal very hot and you have to worry about deformation. For our faceplates with so many cutouts it is doubtful that they can be effeciently produced with a laser. Plus it is expensive.

Milling machine – These machines use a mill head and a bit to cut the metal. They are much more economical, you can buy a decent machine for $10k. It is also very possible to build your own. That’s what we did! It does create heat but it is easy to control with a $200 flood coolant system. The downside is that the gantry needs to be very sturdy and minimal wobble or what is called backlash.

Now with our new metalbot we are cutting 6061 aluminum in .063″ thickness all day. Just to break the misconception about Livid having some crazy mass production, a faceplate takes about an hour to make. Yes that’s right: 8 to 10 a day. If orders get out of hand I will just have to build more robots!  

One of the big downsides to the machine is that it is very particular about what alloy of aluminum it cuts. Alloys such as 5052 and 3003 are very gummy and melt when you cut, leaving a very messy edge. When we were designing the Ohm64 we really wanted to go with pre-finished anodized aluminum. Anodizing is like a clear coat. It has to be pre-finished because we have not found a consistent or cost effective way to put a nice texture on raw aluminum before going to the anodizer. Unfortunately, we have been unable to find the very good machining 6061 in pre-finished sheets. Perhaps someday we will have our own waterjet and use the readily available pre-finished 5005 or 5052. Until then we have found some very cool metallic powder coatings that will be just as nice and durable.

Next week – Ohm 64 circuit board design and assembly using our pick and place robot.

1

Metal Bot

March 17, 2009

This week I had a chance to see our new CNC machine “Metal Bot” as we call it, at our shop in Austin. I shot some video of it, well actually took photos of it using a time-lapse photo device. The result is a really high resolution time-lapse of Metal Bot cutting our new aluminum Ohm 64 faceplates.

0
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes